PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-0.53
Negative P/E while Energy median is 0.21. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
0.67
P/S less than half the Energy median of 4.06. Walter Schloss would verify if this discount reflects fixable issues. Check margins versus peers.
-3.43
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.21. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-3.38
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is 3.37. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-3.90
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 8.91. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-3.43
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.21. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-47.13%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is 0.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-29.62%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.