1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-36.68%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-36.68% vs OGI.TO's -54.48%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.68%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x OGI.TO's -19.18%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
24.20%
Receivables growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 12.00%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-2.65%
Inventory growth below half of OGI.TO's 42.29%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
10.22%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to OGI.TO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.12%
Below half of OGI.TO's 9.42%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
25.25%
≥ 1.5x OGI.TO's 3.62%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.75%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to OGI.TO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-22.75%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to OGI.TO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.73%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to OGI.TO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
22.48%
≥ 1.5x OGI.TO's 3.62%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to OGI.TO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.88%
Below half of OGI.TO's 6.55%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.11%
Less than half of OGI.TO's 54.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.06%
Less than half of OGI.TO's 44.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.06%
Less than half of OGI.TO's 10.02%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.62%
Less than half of OGI.TO's 1.58%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-3.68%
Below half OGI.TO's 0.56%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to OGI.TO's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.11%
Below half OGI.TO's 3.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.88%
Below half OGI.TO's 6.55%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.68%
1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 27.03%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
