PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
114.16%
Net income growth at 50-75% of OGI.TO's 161.68%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
94.53%
D&A growth well above OGI.TO's 46.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
797.79%
Well above OGI.TO's 307.66% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
180.67%
SBC growth well above OGI.TO's 0.27%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-181.03%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OGI.TO at -674.55%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1.41%
AR is negative yoy while OGI.TO is 33.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-432.56%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with OGI.TO at -131.75%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
136819619187916704.00%
A yoy AP increase while OGI.TO is negative at -161.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-78.19%
Negative yoy usage while OGI.TO is 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-206.43%
Negative yoy while OGI.TO is 296.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-96.29%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with OGI.TO at -436.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-174.60%
Negative yoy CapEx while OGI.TO is 13.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
65333.79%
Acquisition growth of 65333.79% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-596.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while OGI.TO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-65.46%
Both yoy lines are negative, with OGI.TO at -97.15%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-52.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -98.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-869.69%
We reduce yoy invests while OGI.TO stands at 89.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-30.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -1.95%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.