1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1804.99%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 57.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.82%
Negative yoy D&A while OGI.TO is 6.26%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-210.31%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OGI.TO stands at 123.15%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-18.66%
Both cut yoy SBC, with OGI.TO at -66.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
83.67%
Slight usage while OGI.TO is negative at -96.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
213.16%
AR growth while OGI.TO is negative at -123.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
55.06%
Some inventory rise while OGI.TO is negative at -32.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-105.54%
Both negative yoy AP, with OGI.TO at -315.15%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
3.34%
Some yoy usage while OGI.TO is negative at -340.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
386.89%
Some yoy increase while OGI.TO is negative at -95.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
90.83%
Some CFO growth while OGI.TO is negative at -435.53%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
37.83%
Lower CapEx growth vs. OGI.TO's 150.11%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
319.83%
Acquisition growth of 319.83% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
103.42%
Purchases growth of 103.42% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-116.21%
We reduce yoy sales while OGI.TO is 129.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3144.44%
We have some outflow growth while OGI.TO is negative at -517.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
105.19%
We have mild expansions while OGI.TO is negative at -14.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-24.59%
We cut debt repayment yoy while OGI.TO is 60.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-103.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -42.07%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.