PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
94.56%
Net income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 11.03%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
11.63%
Some D&A expansion while OGI.TO is negative at -0.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-202.02%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OGI.TO stands at 139.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.78%
SBC growth while OGI.TO is negative at -7.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-620.50%
Negative yoy working capital usage while OGI.TO is 188.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-235.07%
AR is negative yoy while OGI.TO is 223.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
10.99%
Some inventory rise while OGI.TO is negative at -86.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1393.26%
Negative yoy AP while OGI.TO is 98.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
214.93%
Growth well above OGI.TO's 137.40%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-112.88%
Negative yoy while OGI.TO is 1356.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1372.80%
Negative yoy CFO while OGI.TO is 101.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.61%
Some CapEx rise while OGI.TO is negative at -114.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
323.81%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 13623.13%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-112.16%
We reduce yoy other investing while OGI.TO is 99.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1298.68%
We reduce yoy invests while OGI.TO stands at 142.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
39.55%
Debt repayment above 1.5x OGI.TO's 9.30%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
100.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. OGI.TO's 275.18%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.