PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-206.91%
Negative net income growth while OGI.TO stands at 93.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
72.21%
D&A growth well above OGI.TO's 6.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
93.68%
Some yoy growth while OGI.TO is negative at -115.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
173.72%
SBC growth while OGI.TO is negative at -16.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-136.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OGI.TO at -135.53%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
256.17%
AR growth while OGI.TO is negative at -358.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
172.12%
Some inventory rise while OGI.TO is negative at -107.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-226.18%
Negative yoy AP while OGI.TO is 223.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
1286.83%
Some yoy usage while OGI.TO is negative at -404.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
221.21%
Some yoy increase while OGI.TO is negative at -122.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-102.79%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with OGI.TO at -3.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
70.57%
Some CapEx rise while OGI.TO is negative at -63.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
94.33%
Acquisition growth of 94.33% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-98.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -12001900.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
29401.65%
We have some liquidation growth while OGI.TO is negative at -99.03%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-99.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -626720.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
94.92%
We have mild expansions while OGI.TO is negative at -937.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-134.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with OGI.TO at -3.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.