PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.33%
Some net income increase while OGI.TO is negative at -71.90%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.48%
Less D&A growth vs. OGI.TO's 10.33%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-7050.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with OGI.TO at -0.60%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-334.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OGI.TO at -131.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-165.32%
AR is negative yoy while OGI.TO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
37.51%
Inventory growth of 37.51% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-173.34%
Negative yoy AP while OGI.TO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
274.57%
Some yoy usage while OGI.TO is negative at -131.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-46.49%
Negative yoy while OGI.TO is 857.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-91.95%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with OGI.TO at -207.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-41.11%
Negative yoy CapEx while OGI.TO is 70.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-464.10%
Negative yoy acquisition while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
200.00%
Purchases well above OGI.TO's 78.59%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
2885.82%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x OGI.TO's 206.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
140.17%
We have some outflow growth while OGI.TO is negative at -153.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
409.99%
We have mild expansions while OGI.TO is negative at -728.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-607.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while OGI.TO is 87.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.