1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
65.75%
Some net income increase while OGI.TO is negative at -292.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-3.39%
Negative yoy D&A while OGI.TO is 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-808.97%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OGI.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-10.01%
Both cut yoy SBC, with OGI.TO at -47.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
193.51%
Well above OGI.TO's 317.08% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-1178.75%
AR is negative yoy while OGI.TO is 108.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
18.16%
Inventory growth of 18.16% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
552.49%
AP growth of 552.49% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
559.90%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. OGI.TO's 2727.21%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
60.13%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. OGI.TO's 129.88%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
293.60%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of OGI.TO's 338.42%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
2.92%
Some CapEx rise while OGI.TO is negative at -70.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
10316.78%
Acquisition growth of 10316.78% while OGI.TO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
200.00%
Some yoy expansion while OGI.TO is negative at -253950.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
16.81%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 121.54%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
265.10%
We have some outflow growth while OGI.TO is negative at -14.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
51.11%
We have mild expansions while OGI.TO is negative at -39.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.19%
We repay more while OGI.TO is negative at -710.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.