PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.25%
Negative revenue growth while OGI.TO stands at 429.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-11.81%
Negative gross profit growth while OGI.TO is at 80.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1070.05%
Negative EBIT growth while OGI.TO is at 58.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1070.05%
Negative operating income growth while OGI.TO is at 58.22%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
433.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 59.24%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
306.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 61.46%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
306.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 61.46%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
17.10%
Share count expansion well above OGI.TO's 4.46%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
16.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above OGI.TO's 4.46%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
437.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 31.02%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-403.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
197.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
750.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
253.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
253.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
386.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
964.68%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 5715.68%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
964.68%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 5715.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
2364.73%
Below 50% of OGI.TO's 109590.52%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.82%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.96%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
48.98%
Positive asset growth while OGI.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
28.76%
Positive BV/share change while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
18.59%
We have some new debt while OGI.TO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
10.45%
R&D growth of 10.45% while OGI.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
34.18%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.