PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.46%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
6.32%
Positive net income growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.22%
Share count expansion well above OGI.TO's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.33%
Slight or no buyback while OGI.TO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.13%
Positive OCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
150.08%
Positive FCF growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to OGI.TO's 314.34%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-45.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
8257.32%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
66.67%
Positive OCF/share growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
133.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 4.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-1627.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-333.74%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-256.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OGI.TO is 42.45%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
7683.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 4948.57%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
181.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OGI.TO's 22.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.65%
Positive short-term equity growth while OGI.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while OGI.TO shows 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.52%
Inventory is declining while OGI.TO stands at 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.11%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.22%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.60%
Our R&D shrinks while OGI.TO invests at 40.50%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.40%
We expand SG&A while OGI.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.