PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.46%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
6.32%
Positive net income growth while TLRY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
EPS growth of 16.67% while TLRY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
9.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while TLRY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.22%
Slight or no buybacks while TLRY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
6.33%
Slight or no buyback while TLRY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.13%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 163.13%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
150.08%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 150.08%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of TLRY's 352.97%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-45.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
8257.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 9005.52%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
66.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of TLRY's 81.95%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
133.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 136.06%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-1627.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-333.74%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-256.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
7683.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 8397.57%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
181.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of TLRY's 207.81%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
18.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of TLRY's 29.53%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.11%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.22%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.60%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.40%
We expand SG&A while TLRY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.