PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.51%
Revenue growth similar to TLRY's 26.51%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
674.09%
Gross profit growth similar to TLRY's 674.09%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
92.54%
EBIT growth similar to TLRY's 92.54%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
92.54%
Operating income growth similar to TLRY's 92.54%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
89.98%
Net income growth comparable to TLRY's 89.98%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
90.72%
EPS growth similar to TLRY's 90.72%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
90.72%
Similar diluted EPS growth to TLRY's 90.72%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
6.68%
Share count expansion well above TLRY's 6.68%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.68%
Diluted share count expanding well above TLRY's 6.68%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.00%
Similar OCF growth to TLRY's 334.00%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
260.05%
FCF growth similar to TLRY's 260.05%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
480.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 480.08%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-38.62%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1711.87%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 1711.87%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
360.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to TLRY's 360.13%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
543.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 543.04%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-16516.68%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-737.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
38.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to TLRY's 38.51%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
5797.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with TLRY's 5797.52%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
5.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with TLRY's 5.79%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-7.21%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.06%
AR growth well above TLRY's 10.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.11%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.57%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.26%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TLRY's 5.26%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
22.38%
SG&A growth well above TLRY's 22.38%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.