PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.81%
Negative EBIT growth while WEED.TO is at 80.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.81%
Negative operating income growth while WEED.TO is at 80.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-52.65%
Negative net income growth while WEED.TO stands at 80.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-52.63%
Negative EPS growth while WEED.TO is at 80.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-52.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is at 80.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.38%
Share reduction while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.38%
Reduced diluted shares while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.85%
Positive OCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
71.85%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.97%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.97%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.97%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
14.33%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 14.33% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
14.33%
Net income/share CAGR of 14.33% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
14.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-49.46%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-49.46%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-49.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.23%
AR growth of 68.23% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Positive asset growth while WEED.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.82%
We expand SG&A while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.