PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.84%
Positive EBIT growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
34.84%
Positive operating income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
34.95%
Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
34.48%
Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
34.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.38%
Share change of 0.38% while WEED.TO is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.38%
Diluted share change of 0.38% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1204.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1204.92%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 70.69% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
70.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 70.69% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
70.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
85.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
85.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-39.50%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-39.50%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-39.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.18%
Firm’s AR is declining while WEED.TO shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.36%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.85%
We cut SG&A while WEED.TO invests at 241.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.