PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-933.36%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-933.36%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1137.19%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1163.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1163.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-66.98%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.06% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
85.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.06% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
85.06%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
46.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
46.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
46.58%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-56.80%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-56.80%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-56.80%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.52%
Firm’s AR is declining while WEED.TO shows 101.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.38%
Negative asset growth while WEED.TO invests at 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-22.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
933.35%
SG&A growth well above WEED.TO's 16.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.