PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.93%
Negative EBIT growth while WEED.TO is at 87.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-33.93%
Negative operating income growth while WEED.TO is at 87.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.35%
Negative net income growth while WEED.TO stands at 50.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-34.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.96%
OCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 16.39%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
57.96%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.43%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-44.43%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-44.43%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-265.20%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-265.20%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-265.20%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-54.37%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 22454.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-54.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 22454.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-54.37%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 9586.85%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.76%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. WEED.TO's 87.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.79%
Asset growth well under 50% of WEED.TO's 84.01%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-27.60%
We have a declining book value while WEED.TO shows 9591.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.93%
We expand SG&A while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.