PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 14.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
41.93%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 7.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
82.60%
EBIT growth below 50% of WEED.TO's 177.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
82.60%
Operating income growth under 50% of WEED.TO's 177.70%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
100.85%
Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
101.37%
Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
20.86%
Share count expansion well above WEED.TO's 7.29%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
61.58%
Diluted share count expanding well above WEED.TO's 9.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.79%
Negative OCF growth while WEED.TO is at 52.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
16.41%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 81.23% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
81.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
35.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x WEED.TO's 31.99%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
100.20%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 200.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.20%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 385.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
101.39%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of WEED.TO's 190.83%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
172.44%
Equity/share CAGR of 172.44% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
172.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of WEED.TO's 295.73%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
350.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to WEED.TO's 366.53%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.68%
AR growth well above WEED.TO's 29.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-10.75%
Inventory is declining while WEED.TO stands at 83.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
100.93%
Asset growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 43.05%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
76.87%
BV/share growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 36.60%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.65%
We increase R&D while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. WEED.TO's 19.47%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.