PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 13.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-21.47%
Negative gross profit growth while WEED.TO is at 484.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-27.53%
Negative EBIT growth while WEED.TO is at 39.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-27.53%
Negative operating income growth while WEED.TO is at 39.83%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
686.38%
Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
671.43%
Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
669.28%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12852.71%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
5.64%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1150.19%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1150.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-11.55%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
2791.98%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2791.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4465.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1891.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 878.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1891.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 1043.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
4563.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 573.60%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.77%
AR growth well above WEED.TO's 29.50%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
63.89%
Inventory growth well above WEED.TO's 16.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.84%
Asset growth well under 50% of WEED.TO's 47.01%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
13.20%
Positive BV/share change while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
5.20%
Debt shrinking faster vs. WEED.TO's 7265.09%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
96.49%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. WEED.TO's 40.26%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
97.59%
SG&A growth well above WEED.TO's 29.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.