PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
59.45%
Positive revenue growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-53.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-103.69%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-103.69%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
153.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 70.84%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
141.84%
EPS growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 70.81%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
141.84%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 73.51%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
8.51%
Share count expansion well above WEED.TO's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above WEED.TO's 9.67%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.50%
Positive OCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
24.16%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of WEED.TO's 182.68%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-109.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-273.64%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-202.53%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
3051.78%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 3051.78% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
11082.24%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
2188.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3410.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 3410.56% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
16854.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 2561.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
448.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of WEED.TO's 877.81%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.98%
AR growth well above WEED.TO's 4.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.55%
Inventory growth well above WEED.TO's 17.28%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
26.26%
Positive asset growth while WEED.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.83%
Positive BV/share change while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
128.48%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. WEED.TO's 40.69%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
15.04%
SG&A growth well above WEED.TO's 23.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.