PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.48%
Negative revenue growth while WEED.TO stands at 7.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.23%
Negative gross profit growth while WEED.TO is at 114.18%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-61.11%
Negative EBIT growth while WEED.TO is at 48.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-61.11%
Negative operating income growth while WEED.TO is at 48.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-205.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-181.58%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-181.58%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
9.00%
Slight or no buybacks while WEED.TO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above WEED.TO's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.79%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
65.09%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
998.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 334.07%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
70.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 32.34%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
99.10%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-100.92%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
99.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-3992.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2769.45%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-171.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3001.42%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 1855.27%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
191.30%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 394.10%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-26.97%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while WEED.TO shows 8.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-0.89%
Inventory is declining while WEED.TO stands at 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.70%
Positive asset growth while WEED.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-24.79%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
72.83%
Debt growth far above WEED.TO's 8.30%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-42.29%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
39.21%
We expand SG&A while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.