Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)

Positive revenue growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

OCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 24.31%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

FCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 21.48%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 217.08%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 3.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 50.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 1594.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 142.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

Positive short-term equity growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Our AR growth while WEED.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Positive asset growth while WEED.TO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while WEED.TO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

We cut SG&A while WEED.TO invests at 31.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.