PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.18%
Revenue decline while CRON.TO shows 17.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.97%
Cost increase while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-13.34%
Gross profit decline while CRON.TO shows 54.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.55%
Margin decline while CRON.TO shows 61.10% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.80%
R&D growth while CRON.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
9.35%
G&A growth while CRON.TO reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
57.72%
Marketing expense growth while CRON.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
247.43%
Other expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.77%
Operating expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.27%
Total costs growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.84%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
34.91%
D&A growth 50-75% of CRON.TO's 47.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-72.81%
EBITDA decline while CRON.TO shows 80.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.69%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to CRON.TO's 83.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-340.87%
Operating income decline while CRON.TO shows 22.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-351.38%
Operating margin decline while CRON.TO shows 34.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-102.93%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-152.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-155.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-180.21%
Tax expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 131.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-148.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.28%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.28%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.27%
Share count increase while CRON.TO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.