PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.51%
Positive growth while CRON.TO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-25.60%
Cost reduction while CRON.TO shows 5.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
674.09%
Positive growth while CRON.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
553.78%
Margin expansion while CRON.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.26%
R&D growth less than half of CRON.TO's 16.45%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
22.50%
G&A growth while CRON.TO reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
22.03%
Similar marketing expense growth to CRON.TO's 20.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-170.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.97%
Operating expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
383.37%
Interest expense change of 383.37% while CRON.TO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-14.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
96.30%
EBITDA growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 229.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
92.54%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CRON.TO's 0.64%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
94.11%
Operating margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12647.40%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
90.74%
Pre-tax income growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
175.22%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 71.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
89.98%
Net income growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.08%
Net margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.72%
EPS growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.72%
Diluted EPS growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.68%
Share count increase while CRON.TO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.68%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.