PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.51%
Similar revenue growth to CRON.TO's 9.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
10.25%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 3.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
7.27%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 40.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.04%
Margin decline while CRON.TO shows 27.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-29.11%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
6.96%
G&A growth less than half of CRON.TO's 37.36%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
9.07%
Marketing expense growth while CRON.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
78.03%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRON.TO's 339.72%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.97%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRON.TO's 18.96%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.29%
Similar total costs growth to CRON.TO's 10.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-12.30%
Interest expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.48%
D&A growth while CRON.TO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.69%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.86%
EBITDA margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.53%
Operating income decline while CRON.TO shows 2.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.98%
Operating margin decline while CRON.TO shows 11.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
45.19%
Other expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-146.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
12.27%
Net income growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.89%
Net margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.96%
EPS growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.96%
Diluted EPS growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.73%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.