PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.45%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x CRON.TO's 3.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
6.69%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 2.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 5.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.77%
Margin decline while CRON.TO shows 1.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-42.86%
R&D reduction while CRON.TO shows 17.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.21%
Similar G&A growth to CRON.TO's 4.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
-30.50%
Marketing expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 17.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
43.24%
Similar other expenses growth to CRON.TO's 55.57%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
7.44%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRON.TO's 11.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.00%
Similar total costs growth to CRON.TO's 6.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-21.09%
Interest expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.03%
D&A growth less than half of CRON.TO's 47.96%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-625.01%
EBITDA decline while CRON.TO shows 47.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-597.86%
EBITDA margin decline while CRON.TO shows 49.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1562.95%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-146.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-133.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
129.80%
Tax expense growth while CRON.TO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-117.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.58%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-123.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.20%
Share count reduction while CRON.TO shows 25.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.20%
Diluted share reduction while CRON.TO shows 25.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.