PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.25%
Revenue decline while OGI.TO shows 429.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
42.84%
Cost increase while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.81%
Gross profit decline while OGI.TO shows 80.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.45%
R&D change of 10.45% while OGI.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
71.57%
G&A growth while OGI.TO reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
3.83%
Marketing expense growth while OGI.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-11.93%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
31.72%
Operating expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.31%
Total costs growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
334.21%
Interest expense growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.61%
D&A growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 4.00%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-156.43%
EBITDA decline while OGI.TO shows 64.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-598.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1070.05%
Operating income decline while OGI.TO shows 58.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1072.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1252.78%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
433.16%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 59.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
434.51%
Pre-tax margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6370.24%
Tax expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 15.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
433.16%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 59.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
434.51%
Net margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
306.74%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 61.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
306.74%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 61.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of OGI.TO's 4.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
16.43%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of OGI.TO's 4.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.