PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.18%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
0.97%
Cost increase while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-13.34%
Gross profit decline while OGI.TO shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.55%
Margin decline while OGI.TO shows 9.23% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.80%
R&D growth less than half of OGI.TO's 93.52%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
9.35%
G&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 27.67%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
57.72%
Similar marketing expense growth to OGI.TO's 55.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
247.43%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.77%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 38.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.27%
Similar total costs growth to OGI.TO's 8.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-14.84%
Interest expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 127.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
34.91%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x OGI.TO's 28.46%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-72.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
79.69%
EBITDA margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-340.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-351.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.93%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-152.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-155.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-180.21%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-148.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.28%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.28%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.27%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 5.53%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.36%
Diluted share reduction while OGI.TO shows 2.44% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.