PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.97%
Similar revenue growth to OGI.TO's 22.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
25.11%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 18.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-9.53%
Gross profit decline while OGI.TO shows 58.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-23.31%
Margin decline while OGI.TO shows 29.26% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
188.72%
R&D growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 28.88%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-32.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
48.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 19.05%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
156.00%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.86%
Operating expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 18.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.87%
Total costs growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 18.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
41.73%
Interest expense growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.75%
D&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 169.93%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
94.19%
EBITDA growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
131.61%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 184.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-37.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
152.56%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
113.77%
Pre-tax income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.67%
Pre-tax margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Tax expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 343.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
111.86%
Net income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.06%
Net margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.82%
EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.82%
Diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.21%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 318.81%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
68.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 324.87%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.