1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Revenue decline while OGI.TO shows 9.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
9.66%
Cost increase while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-41.28%
Gross profit decline while OGI.TO shows 1642.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-39.59%
Margin decline while OGI.TO shows 1513.78% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
89.29%
R&D growth while OGI.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-7.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
26.17%
Marketing expense growth while OGI.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1405.27%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 1208.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.42%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.25%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.09%
D&A growth while OGI.TO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-774.69%
EBITDA decline while OGI.TO shows 125.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
86.17%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 126.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
20.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 79.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.73%
Operating margin growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 81.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
145.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of OGI.TO's 392.82%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-117.61%
Pre-tax income decline while OGI.TO shows 110.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while OGI.TO shows 109.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.06%
Tax expense growth less than half of OGI.TO's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-89.15%
Net income decline while OGI.TO shows 110.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.61%
Net margin decline while OGI.TO shows 109.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.84%
EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 109.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.84%
Diluted EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 108.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.24%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
3.24%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 18.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.