1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 53.52%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.69%
Cost growth less than half of OGI.TO's 63.17%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
2.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of OGI.TO's 33.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.86%
R&D reduction while OGI.TO shows 12.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.21%
G&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 19.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-30.50%
Marketing expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 29.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
43.24%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.44%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 3.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.00%
Total costs growth less than half of OGI.TO's 35.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-21.09%
Interest expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.03%
D&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 42.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-625.01%
EBITDA decline while OGI.TO shows 19.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-597.86%
EBITDA margin decline while OGI.TO shows 47.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.44%
Operating income decline while OGI.TO shows 32.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.48%
Operating margin decline while OGI.TO shows 56.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1562.95%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 528.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-146.52%
Pre-tax income decline while OGI.TO shows 284.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-133.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while OGI.TO shows 220.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
129.80%
Tax expense change of 129.80% while OGI.TO maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-117.73%
Net income decline while OGI.TO shows 284.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.48%
Net margin decline while OGI.TO shows 220.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.58%
EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 265.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.71%
Diluted EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 260.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.20%
Share count reduction while OGI.TO shows 13.55% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.20%
Diluted share reduction while OGI.TO shows 17.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.