1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.00%
Negative ROE while ACB.TO stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.87%
Negative ROA while ACB.TO stands at 0.07%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.67%
Positive ROCE while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
97.31%
Gross margin 75-90% of ACB.TO's 111.34%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
37.70%
Positive operating margin while ACB.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
-50.65%
Negative net margin while ACB.TO has 2.72%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.