1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.46%
Negative ROE while ACB.TO stands at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.32%
Negative ROA while ACB.TO stands at 0.18%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.41%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
32.58%
Gross margin 50-75% of ACB.TO's 59.91%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-7.96%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-6.60%
Negative net margin while ACB.TO has 13.33%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.