1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-6.37%
Negative ROE while CRON.TO stands at 3.49%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.29%
Negative ROA while CRON.TO stands at 3.10%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.72%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
24.60%
Positive margin while CRON.TO is negative. John Neff would see if this confers a decisive advantage.
-26.91%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-75.12%
Negative net margin while CRON.TO has 365.22%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.