1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-3.38%
Negative ROE while WEED.TO stands at 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-3.00%
Negative ROA while WEED.TO stands at 2.77%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-3.72%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
64.59%
Gross margin below 50% of WEED.TO's 186.24%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-23.43%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-21.27%
Negative net margin while WEED.TO has 63.90%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.