PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
17.15
Positive P/E while ACB.TO shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.51
Similar P/S to ACB.TO's 22.56. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
0.64
Similar P/B to ACB.TO's 0.70. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-58.09
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-63.86
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
0.64
Similar fair value ratio to ACB.TO's 0.70. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
1.46%
Positive earnings while ACB.TO shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-1.72%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.