205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while ADI is negative at -26.58%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 60.95%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth while ADI is negative at -0.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ADI at -183.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ADI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-105.13%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
303.45%
AP growth of 303.45% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-505.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ADI at -205.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-190.91%
Negative yoy while ADI is 76.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ADI at -46.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Some CapEx rise while ADI is negative at -7.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ADI stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Purchases growth of 68.79% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
437.05%
Liquidation growth of 437.05% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
96.79%
Growth well above ADI's 107.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
143.00%
Investing outflow well above ADI's 14.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.13%
Debt repayment well below ADI's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
204.17%
Issuance growth of 204.17% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-235.58%
We cut yoy buybacks while ADI is 38.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.