205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.15%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 8.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
2.49%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -1.58%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 22.94%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.11%
SBC growth well above ADI's 10.15%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
67.77%
Less working capital growth vs. ADI's 159.66%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
95.88%
AR growth of 95.88% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-38.46%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-124.64%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
52.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ADI's 154.53%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2750.00%
Negative yoy while ADI is 116.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ADI's 72.07%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.32%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 12.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.83%
Purchases growth of 29.83% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
22.75%
We have some liquidation growth while ADI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-1878.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -17.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
111.45%
Investing outflow well above ADI's 19.15%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-72.45%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-46.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -20.22%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.