205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of ADI's 19.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -1.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1300.00%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -15.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-27.54%
Negative yoy SBC while ADI is 3.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
336.76%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -175.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-785.71%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-132.50%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
305.88%
AP growth of 305.88% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
339.29%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -182.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
108.77%
Some yoy increase while ADI is negative at -774.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
14.47%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -14.44%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -45.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.27%
Purchases growth of 13.27% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 2403.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 21.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Issuance growth of 38.89% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.79%
Buyback growth below 50% of ADI's 13.52%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.