PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Negative net income growth while ADI stands at 2.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.84%
D&A growth well above ADI's 2.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
95.38%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -20.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
67.74%
SBC growth while ADI is negative at -6.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-9488.89%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ADI is 73.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-87.59%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-50.42%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-464.71%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-236.97%
Negative yoy usage while ADI is 73.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1.59%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ADI's 154.97%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-43.19%
Negative yoy CFO while ADI is 22.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-1.55%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 42.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.30%
Purchases growth of 18.30% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
10.30%
Liquidation growth of 10.30% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
81.82%
Growth well above ADI's 105.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
102.73%
Investing outflow well above ADI's 42.53%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ADI is 86.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
70.00%
Issuance growth of 70.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
87.85%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ADI's 20.00%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.