205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ADI at -43.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.31%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -8.78%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-41.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 85.75%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-13.92%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -12.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4766.67%
Well above ADI's 141.45% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1045.00%
AR growth of 1045.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
49.16%
Inventory growth of 49.16% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-137.04%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
15.66%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ADI's 141.45%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
112.12%
Some yoy increase while ADI is negative at -163.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.67%
Negative yoy CFO while ADI is 3.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.21%
Some CapEx rise while ADI is negative at -46.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-400.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.72%
Purchases growth of 16.72% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.23%
Liquidation growth of 18.23% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-20.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -22.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
81.64%
We have mild expansions while ADI is negative at -46.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while ADI is 31.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.