PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 147.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.33%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -7.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
52.63%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.48%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
165.88%
Well above AMD's 44.44% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
125.45%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -225.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
76.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 168.89%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
18.64%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 1400.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
18200.00%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -800.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -108.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 164.29%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-28.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -26.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
28.75%
Acquisition growth of 28.75% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 90.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -38.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-18.18%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 840.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-147.76%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 376.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to AMD's 99.79%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-45.60%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
9.83%
Buyback growth of 9.83% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.