205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -2241.18%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.97%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -2.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
185.19%
Deferred tax of 185.19% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-3.23%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -23.81%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
49.40%
Less working capital growth vs. AMD's 361.54%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
430.95%
AR growth well above AMD's 245.19%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-371.43%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 243.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.50%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -576.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-82.87%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -42.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-517.39%
Negative yoy while AMD is 6275.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.03%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 544.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-21.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 24.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
21.36%
Acquisition growth of 21.36% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-33.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -414.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
15.29%
At 75-90% of AMD's 18.75%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
68.13%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -56.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-28.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -63.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-4.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.