205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -6.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -2.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-52.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
24.14%
SBC growth of 24.14% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-206.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -83.04%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-131.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -77.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-242.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -96.34%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 67.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 525.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
129.30%
Well above AMD's 85.71%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-54.34%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -179.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 18.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
81.02%
Purchases growth of 81.02% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
105.95%
Liquidation growth of 105.95% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
94.83%
Growth of 94.83% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
184.89%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 18.75%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to AMD's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-38.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-0.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.