205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -43.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.32%
D&A growth of 1.32% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
121.43%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
41.67%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -20.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-274.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -286.96%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-140.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -155.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-394.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -519.05%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-232.20%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 156.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-996.77%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
80.84%
Well above AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-42.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -259.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -9.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Purchases growth of 43.17% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
46.41%
Liquidation growth of 46.41% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
126.27%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.98%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -846.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
75.00%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of AMD's 100.00%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
1441.67%
Stock issuance far above AMD's 900.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-15.79%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.