205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 78.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-700.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.29%
SBC growth well above AMD's 4.35%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
17.19%
Less working capital growth vs. AMD's 55.81%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.12%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 34.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-96.23%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 106.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
115.38%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -211.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
38.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 148.19%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
131.25%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -64.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.35%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 72.58%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-18.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 47.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.95%
Liquidation growth of 12.95% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-561.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103.00%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 150.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-47.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-18.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.