205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-73.23%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -14.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.44%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
8050.00%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-16.67%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -27.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
601.24%
Well above AMD's 402.38% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
382.08%
AR growth well above AMD's 336.31%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-225.64%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 41.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
48.94%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -1350.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
346.96%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -446.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2900.00%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
12.02%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 480.30%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-24.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -29.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.19%
Acquisition growth of 24.19% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-14.13%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -98.82%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-25.26%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 6000.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-84.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -184.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.16%
Issuance growth of 113.16% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-8.62%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.