PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 32.79%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.23%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 12.82%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth well above AMD's 52.38%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -200.39%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -176.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -138.18%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 152.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 111.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-282.14%
Negative yoy while AMD is 37.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-42.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -122.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
18.18%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -4.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
31.31%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
84.18%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.32%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -65.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
129.62%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -6.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AMD's 65.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
9.88%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -70.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-23.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.