205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -4.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 550.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth well above AMD's 3.51%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -12866.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 136.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-105.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -227.59%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
303.45%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -177.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-505.75%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 63.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-190.91%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -95.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -114.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -30.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Purchases growth of 68.79% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
437.05%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 131.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
96.79%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -212.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
143.00%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -180.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
0.13%
Debt repayment well below AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
204.17%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -95.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-235.58%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.