205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 356.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.80%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 8.60%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
56.86%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -3157.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-16.00%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
238.74%
Well above AMD's 25.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
89.81%
AR growth well above AMD's 119.37%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
82.81%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -434.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
123.08%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -324.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
742.31%
Growth well above AMD's 304.33%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-384.38%
Negative yoy while AMD is 112.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
47.26%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AMD's 63.42%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-45.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
45.21%
Acquisition growth of 45.21% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
7.44%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 32.63%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
211.18%
Liquidation growth of 211.18% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-45.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 53.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.50%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 46.45%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.