205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 30.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
D&A growth well above AMD's 1.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1300.00%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -22.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-27.54%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 19.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
336.76%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -726.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -229.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -23.21%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
AP growth well above AMD's 250.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
339.29%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -397.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
108.77%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -645.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
14.47%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -10.82%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -32.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.27%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -183.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 69.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -98.91%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-796.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -169.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Issuance growth of 38.89% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.79%
We have some buyback growth while AMD is negative at -266.54%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.